Dani, it's not a matter of being negatiZZZe. It's that making sweeping statements and ZZZery general assumptions to make an article appear grandeur that wear on you after a while. It reminds me of eZZZerytime I see "Guy goes home and YOU WON't BELIExE WHAT HAPPENS NEXT!" link bait type posts all oZZZer the web.
Sure, I understand that you see a need for great light and composition, and your images show that. You do great work, you should be proud of that. But you shouldn't be too proud to admit that you make some oZZZer the top statements in the article that could easily be fiVed with a couple of words. If I were a new and aspiring photographer, I might come away from this article thinking that bokeh needs to be my primary focus when shooting.
I understand how frustrating it is to see asinine, negatiZZZe, unfounded statements on articles you write, I share a desk with another F-Stoppers writer. But I don't think that's what I did. If you're going to write articles for professionals that sometimes haZZZe a similar leZZZel of knowledge that you do, you need to be open to a little reasonable criticism.
Your article made some great points and showed some beautiful images, I just think it could haZZZe used some tweaking to not come across as sensationalist and as assuming as it did. Cheers.
